+1 for freezing it

i only don't know if everything is ported now correctly?
juergen was busy with something i believe (markup finding??)


johan


On 5/13/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



I'd like to propose that we freeze the codebase now so we can work on
bugs over the next few weeks for a Release Candidate.  This is quite
critical timing NOW for people who have been promised that a mid-June
or early July launch of a commercial product on Wicket would be workable.
I know I am one such person, but I can also point to other such promises
made by the dev team (myself, eelco, others) on this mailing list.

This said, I'm not so hell-bent on shipping that I'd argue for a freeze
before fixing something that's truly important.  But we do really need to
wrap this up as soon as humanly possible so we can ship a FINAL product
in just a few very short weeks.  So, here's the vote:

[ ] I'm ready to freeze the codebase for RC bug fixing.

[ ] Hold your horses, we REALLY MUST (fill in the blank) ______ first.

NOTE: If someone comes up with a good reason not to freeze, we can
revote with that on the ballot.


--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Code-Freeze-for-RC-tf3735383.html#a10455790
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Reply via email to