actually, this is how i had it before almaw told me that would break
everything.


Johan Compagner wrote:
> 
> ok we really need to fix this because this is broken now
> 
> what i can do is in attach() this:
> 
>             setFlag(FLAG_ATTACHED, true);
>             attachChildren();
> 
> swap:
>             attachChildren();
>             setFlag(FLAG_ATTACHED, true);
> 
> (i think we should do this anyway)
> 
> and then in checkForHierarchy()
> 
>     if (!isAttached())
>         {
>             throw new WicketRuntimeException(
>                     "Cannot modify component unattached components");
>         }
> 
> so test for is it attached()
> that sounds logical
> 
> except one problem in the constructor currently the component s not
> attached
> so what i can do is make a component when it is created default attached
> (that sounds also logical to me)
> but then onAttach() is the first time not called (because that was the
> constructor)
> 
> If this is not a good idea we need another flag or something (on page)
> where
> we test really if the page
> is in the right state. Because the whole attach cycle nothing should be
> possible to change hierachy.
> 
> johan
> 
> On 5/14/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> hmm also now we don't test globally any more things can go wrong
>>
>> a component can't alter itself. But it can alter everything else!
>>
>> as i said it can do: parent.add/remove
>>
>> but it can also do: child.add /remove (because that one isn't in
>> attaching
>> yet...)
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/14/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>> >
>> > the same goes i guess for attaching:
>> >
>> >             setFlag(FLAG_ATTACHING, false);
>> >             setFlag(FLAG_ATTACHED, true);
>> >             attachChildren();
>> >
>> >
>> > thats also wrong. The parent is attaching false but then the children
>> > attach is called
>> > so a child can do this:
>> >
>> > parent.remove(this)
>> >
>> > that would work fine now in attaching mode as far as i can see.
>> >
>> > johan
>> >
>> >
>> > On 5/14/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > hmm this could go wrong now:
>> > >
>> > >             setFlag(FLAG_RENDERING, true);
>> > >             onBeforeRenderChildren();
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > we first set the flag in rendering then call the onBefore on all the
>> > > childs
>> > >
>> > > so the parent is already i render mode (can't be changed) but the
>> > > childs should be able to still alter the state
>> > > thats a bit strange i think the rendering flag should be on true only
>> > > if all the childs are also called? agree?
>> > >
>> > > johan
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 5/14/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > I committed a fix to this this morning that I have confidence
>> > > > in.  Still
>> > > > having problems due to this refactor.  Who did it?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Jonathan Locke wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > unless you can get to this fast, i'm going to guess a fix because
>> > > > > we're blocked on this.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Johan Compagner wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> will check it out asap
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On 5/12/07, Jonathan Locke < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Opened new blocking bug:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-558
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Jonathan Locke wrote:
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> > Because components are created in onBeforeRender in list
>> views
>> > > > (it
>> > > > >>> calls
>> > > > >>> > populateItem then), it is necessary for AJAX renderings now
>> to
>> > > > call
>> > > > >>> > beforeRender on every component to be updated before
>> > > > proceeding with
>> > > > >>> the
>> > > > >>> > render.
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> > It looks like AjaxRequestTarget.respondComponent should call
>> > > > before
>> > > > >>> render
>> > > > >>> > on the component tree it's about to render.  But I'm unsure
>> if
>> > > > this is
>> > > > >>> the
>> > > > >>> > right place to make the change.  Johan can you look at this
>> > > > since you
>> > > > >>> were
>> > > > >>> > doing this refactor and probably know all the details?
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>> >
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> --
>> > > > >>> View this message in context:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > >
>> http://www.nabble.com/New-attach-%3EbeforeRender-refactor-breaks-ajax-updating-of-list-views-tf3729131.html#a10443272
>> > > > >>> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com .
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > View this message in context:
>> > > >
>> http://www.nabble.com/New-attach-%3EbeforeRender-refactor-breaks-ajax-updating-of-list-views-tf3729131.html#a10609034
>> > > > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/New-attach-%3EbeforeRender-refactor-breaks-ajax-updating-of-list-views-tf3729131.html#a10614050
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to