[X] yes accept wicket-contrib-velocity


Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> In the licensing mumbo jumbo, graduation proceedings and fixing bugs
> for 1.3.0 we forgot to officially vote wicket-contrib-velocity in. So
> with further ado:
> 
> [ ] no, let's not accept wicket-contrib-velocity, because...
> 
> The velocity project was originally written by Eelco, and has received
> a contribution from James McLaughlin, who has submitted his patch to
> JIRA [1].
> 
> This is a majority vote, with a minimum of 3 +1 binding votes, and
> runs for 72 hours.
> 
> Martijn
> 
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-542
> 
> -- 
> Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
> Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
> http://wicketframework.org
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/-vote--Accept-wicket-contrib-velocity-sub-project-tf3815668.html#a10822274
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to