With a big thanks to Juergen for bringing this unclosed vote to my
attention, I'd like to do the tally and claim that this vote has
passed with 9 binding +1 votes, and 2 non-binding +1 votes. No -1 or 0
votes were counted.

+1 binding: Martijn, Al, Janne, Gwyn, Eelco, Ate, Jonathan,
Jean-Baptiste, Juergen
+1 non-binding: C. Bergstöm, Philip.

Thanks for voting!

Martijn

On 5/25/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,

In the licensing mumbo jumbo, graduation proceedings and fixing bugs
for 1.3.0 we forgot to officially vote wicket-contrib-velocity in. So
with further ado:

[ ] yes accept wicket-contrib-velocity
[ ] no, let's not accept wicket-contrib-velocity, because...

The velocity project was originally written by Eelco, and has received
a contribution from James McLaughlin, who has submitted his patch to
JIRA [1].

This is a majority vote, with a minimum of 3 +1 binding votes, and
runs for 72 hours.

Martijn

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-542

--
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org



--
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

Reply via email to