Intention. Read the javadocs.
What you are proposing is changing the meaning of the document without
any idea: what would happen if:
<h1 wicket:id="foo">[foo]</h1>
is used? Would setStripWicketTags remove the <h1> too?
Component#setRenderBodyOnly(boolean) is what you are looking for.
Martijn
On 5/27/07, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
i've come across a behaviour, that IMHO is wrong:
when i have a wicket label e.g:
HTML:
<div wicket:id="foo"> bla bla </div>
adn use it as new Label("foo", "bar") in dev, he puts out:
result: <div wicket:id="foo">bar</div>
wich is right; however if i do:
getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true);
in the init he puts out:
result: <div>bar</div>
which is blowing up HTML-output for nothing - IMHO if the tags are empty
after the wicket:id has been stripped they should be removed completely.
Is this behavoir intention or a bug?
--
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org
