1; the label was just an example - the reason I choose <div> is that <span> is invalid for certain surroundings while <div> is always valid
2; no - in all cases where <div> is solo and empty it is very bad html output IMHO to have empty <div>'s - they allways should have at least any kind of descriptor/ tag in them > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Herman Bovens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Montag, 28. Mai 2007 01:19 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: AW: wicket 1.3.0 snapshot / wicket tags in div > > > 1) I think you should only use a <div> tag if you want > one. I usually use <span> for labels. > 2) If removing the tag is what you want, I assume that's only > for labels and only in some cases. Why not create a subclass > of Label which calls > setRenderBodyOnly(true) in the constructor? > > > Korbinian Bachl wrote: > > > > hmm, makes sense - there is no global way to get rid of these empty > > div's ? > > (putting a .setRenderBodyOnly(true) to every seems quite a pain) > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/wicket-1.3.0-snapshot---wicket-tags-in-d iv-tf3824821.html#a10829469 > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
