Redundant, but you would never have questions whether versions of project x are compatible with wicket y.
On 2/26/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > so what hapens when we release lets say 1.3. are we going to bump the > version up on all of those even though there is no difference ( if that part > of wicket remained the same) ? > -Igor > > > > On 2/26/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > [ x ] all packages from the wicket core project should have the > > > same major/minor release numbers > > > [ ] all extraneous projects have their own release schedule, and > > > hence their own release numbers > > > > This doesn't go for the wicket-stuff projects, but for the wicket core > > projects, it makes sense to have the same release numbers. They don't > > have to be exactly in sync (core might be 1.2.1 and auth 1.2.4), but > > in general I think it is easier to find for people if we use the same > > numberings. > > > > Eelco > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting > language > > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live > webcast > > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding > territory! > > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 > > _______________________________________________ > > Wicket-develop mailing list > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
