On 3/5/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The first parameter of PackageResource.bind is Application which is > probably a left over from many versions ago. Besides the fact that > nothing is done with that parameter, it is not consistent with the get > methods. > > I'd like to remove that parameter, but that breaks the API (though it > is not a feature that is used /that/ often). > > Furthermore, I think wicket.markup.html is probably not the best > package for PackageResource and friends; just wicket or > wicket.application would make more sense. However, that's not a biggy, > and we probably don't want to break tooooo much. > > I just comitted an improvement for PackageResource so that you can > bind resources using a regular expression that is used to match files > of the package of the provided scope (thus NOT any subpackages) > instead of one-by-one/ absolute only.
For example: "*\\.js" matches all files with extension js in that package. > > Eelco > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
