If not impossible.
johan
On 4/11/06,
Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/11/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> May I suggest we delay this request for the next release? No need to quickly
> adjust this /now/ and add another couple of weeks of testing to our already
> overdue 1.2 release?
>
> Apparently the pro's are: probably stateless application possible (no
> guarantee yet?)
>
> But the cons are:
> - api break
> - apparently not a trivial change, more design decisions to be made
> - not tested yet
> - it's a feature, not a bug
Ok, that was predictable :). So for now, everybody has wait for the
next major release and until then have live with the fact that Wicket
cannot operate without sessions unless a custom session store is used.
I opened an issue (bug as I do think it's a fix for a faulty API and
not just an enhancement) here:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1468853&group_id=119783&atid=684975
Eelco
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
