On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 20:34:21 +0000, Chris Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about using a synonym of list, > something like Sequence, RepeatedElement or similar?
"Series" is the best I can come up with... > Also +1 for rolling back and revisting each change before applying to > the code. I think we should really focus on a contrib package for new, > ehnanced or refactored components and code and only roll them into the > core code if they are thoroughly tested and prove their worth as > something common. Not sure if contrib is the right name though, as to me, that suggests too much of a separation from the core. I'd tend towards a 'component' package, but that's just me! > My personal view is that we should NEVER modify the > core or Wicket unless there is a really strong argument, design and > review associated with the change. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086006/ :-) It should certainly be the default option, but you might need to be careful you're not making too much overhead/work for yourself with the app still in an pre-release state. /Gwyn ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
