yes. well, the whole idea of removing tags is contrary to the docs.
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Hmmm... sounds dirty AND contrairy to the docs you wrote. On the other hand, I wouldn't mind having this. Kind of +/- 0.
Eelco
Jonathan Locke wrote:
could we make a generic ComponentTagAttributeRemover thing somehow that would either render or not render the tag it's attached to but still render its body?
Jonathan Locke wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
