:) In the spirit of convincing everyone else that they're
wrong.......
If we change the tag ID at runtime, how are Wicket pages
supposed to get previewed?
Gili
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:18:07 -0800 (PST), Jonathan Locke wrote:
>
>+/- 0
>
>On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Gili wrote:
>
>>
>> You are right, it should be consistent. My vote is still for
>> keeping the tag ID the same before and after processing. What about
>> everyone else?
>>
>> Gili
>>
>> On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:06:13 +0100, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>>
>> >It's just not how it currently is; currently all tags have wicket-
>> >removed except for the panel reference tag. We should choose one
>> >(default) and implement it consistently.
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
>> Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
>> It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wicket-develop mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
>Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
>It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
>_______________________________________________
>Wicket-develop mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
