How many installations are out there that don't have security installed?
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:33:16 -0800, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i'm wondering two things about ICrypt and Crypt > > first, is this really a good idea from a security standpoint? > > and if we're going to include this, shouldn't there be a default Crypt > that doesn't require installing security stuff? > yes, that is probably a good idea. But I'd definitely prefer to keep the current implementation in. There many many real life web application which use "remember me" and which require encryption. Why not provide two implementations with Wicket. > a null Crypt implementation that prints out a warning and returns the > string it is passed might be better than junit tests that fail if you're > not set up right. > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting > Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time > by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. > Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-develop mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
