Yes, please! Though after all this time practicing, I'm finally getting
to where I can say 'ComponentTagAttributeModifier' in less than ten
seconds, I allways felt the name was a bit long.
Eelco
Jonathan Locke wrote:
i realize this is a fairly gratuitous change idea, but is there any
value in the ComponentTag prefix on this class? it quickly becomes
obvious in wicket that you can only modify component tags. so,
wouldn't AttributeModifier be just as good and shorter to boot?
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
