On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 18:17:54 +0100, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>Well, I read the hurrays on TSS, so yeah, it probably *is* very good.
>However, it should be at least pluggable as not everyone might agree
>with you, nor prefer to use XStream, and while it is pluggable, I think
>we should stick to standard JDK stuff as much as possible, so that if
>you don't want to use XStream, you don't need the dependency. That's
>fair enough isn't it?
Fair enough. I assume Hibernate support is part of contrib too
right?
>Hibernate 3 is neat. I just started a new (hobby) project using it with
>annotations. I hate the fact that they changed the package names though,
>I'll probably remove the Hibernate part of wicket-contrib because of this.
Their annotation support is still half baked so it's taking me
a while to get it to recognize my generic types but it's coming along
slowly :P
Gili
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
