Ok, I found this:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=6585080&forum_id=
42354
I'm going to give it some thought.
Gili
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:00:18 -0500, Gili wrote:
>On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 07:56:43 +0100, Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
>
>>100% html output compliance. Is that good enough for a reason? please
>>review the discussion we had regarding that topic.
>
> I don't see why you can't just use the id prefix for that...?
>
>>You still didn't explain why <span wicket="xxx" id="yyy" > breaks
>>previewability.
>
> I was thinking you were refering to using
>
><span wicket="xxx">
>
> that is, replacing "id" by "wicket". If you're going to use
>both, HTML browsers, validators, tools will flags your code as invalid
>(since it fails to meet the HTML DTD) but I think it should still
>preview fine because browsers tend to ignore errors silently. Still, my
>view is that you can avoid all of this and just use "id" to begin with.
>
>Gili
>
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
