On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:01:55 +0100, Jonathan Locke wrote:
>the only concern i really can think of right now is:
>
>how old of a version of dreamweaver/xyz html editor do you have to have
>before wicket stops working with the wicket:id syntax?
>it might be reasonable to continue supporting the id="wicket-xyz" syntax
>in case people are using particularly stupid html editors.
>i don't see much value in the wicket="xyz" syntax though...
>
>i think we should still support stripping wicket tags and wicket id
>attributes.
Macromedia Dreamweaver, even the latest version, will complain
about Wicket tags being unsupported by browsers but will not prevent
you from continuing developing or rendering properly. I doubt older
versions are any more broken. Has anyone experienced problems with
wicket namespace tags using any other editor? If not, we should just go
ahead until we hear otherwise. I am also for optionally stripping away
wicket:id tags (I'd have it on by default) but not normal id tags.
Gili
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
