Hi,
I find the resources classes we have here in wicket very confusing..
Because we have a IResource interface. and a AbstractResource class which implement the interface
But we also have an abstract class Resource but that isn't a IResource but a IResourceListener.
This is a bit confusing naming.
I think the Resource class that has a method getResource() (that returns a IResource) is a ResourceLocator
So i think that the Resource class should be renamed to ResourceLocator and all subclasses like WebResource
and SharedResource should also be called: WebResourceLocator and SharedResourceLocator..
The problem is that we already have a ResourceLocator class... that also returns IResource objects..
So maybe Resource->ResourceHolder?
johan
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
