Sounds like an idea. I'm not sure how important it is, but it sounds consistent.
Eelco On 10/9/05, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > would it make sense to use the page class alias for the package > resource scope as well? Currently the cope is equal to the fully > qualified page class name? > > Juergen > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, > and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-develop mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
