Hello list, I did post this RFE.

My thought is exactly what Martijn and Eelco explained, thanks.

This request is very minor one.
What I want is just to remove "setRenderBodyOnly(true);" from my code.
(I know it is just a one line, though)
That's it.

And thanks to you all for the great framework.
I love it pretty much.

Takafumi Magara


On 2005/10/10, at 18:42, Eelco Hillenius wrote:

I think his point is that he wants an easy/ quick way of telling the
the listview elements themselves should not be rendered.

Eelco

On 10/10/05, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I think he wants to do:

 <wicket:dummy id="listview">
     <span wicket:id="name">name</span>
 </wicket:dummy>

 add(new ListView("listview") {
     protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
         add(new Label("name"));

     }
 }

On 10/10/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

and what should we do with wicket:dummy?
You can already use wicket:remove
http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Tags



On 10/10/05, SourceForge.net < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Feature Requests item #1321797, was opened at 2005-10-10 05:13
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item

Submitter

You can respond by visiting:


https://sourceforge.net/tracker/? func=detail&atid=684978&aid=1321797&group_id=119783


Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment

thread,

including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: core
Group: 1.1
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: tyrhant (tyrhant)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Introduce dummy tag

Initial Comment:
I want some dummy tag that can be used instead of div or span.

Currently, my code is like this
<span wicket:id="list">
  <span wicket:id="label" /><br />
</span>
and I call setRenderBodyOnly(true) in Java side for "list" component.

If we have dummy wicket tag, I can write
<wicket:dummy wicket:id="list">
  <span wicket:id="label" /><br />
</wicket:dummy>
and just setStripWicketTag(true) does the job, right?
I think this way is better for Java-HTML separation than using
setRenderBodyOnly() method.

The name "dummy" may be not a nice one.
Please give it some better name.

That's it.
Thanks.



--------------------------------------------------------------------- -


You can respond by visiting:


https://sourceforge.net/tracker/? func=detail&atid=684978&aid=1321797&group_id=119783



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads,

discussions,

and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]


https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop











-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

Reply via email to