Eelco Hillenius wrote:
That could be two nice projects for wicket-stuff. Someone has to start
them though. I've made a couple of simple XUL pages in the past. It's
quite easy to do. All you need is to create a corresponding component
hierarchy. I don't know how client server interaction works - that
might be an issue - but one of the plans we have is to further
flexibilize (is that English?) our URL parsing/ state handling so that
that could be better supported too.
That sounds promising. I have to admit that I have never really done
anything with XUL, but what I saw and what I read about it is very
interesting.
OpenLazlo is markup based (XML) too, right? If it is, the same rules
apply meaning you should be able to do most of it right now.
It is markup based, but OpenLaszlo generates Flash-content on the server
side. So Wicket would have to create the markup und pass it on the
OpenLaszlo to generate the Flash-content.
- Johannes
Eelco
On 11/4/05, Johannes Fahrenkrug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
These are no important points, just ideas:
What about OpenLaszlo (http://www.openlaszlo.org) integration/support?
And what do you guys think about XUL support?
- Johannes.
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
All,
As we just have release 1.1 I'd like to start a feature discussion on
Wicket 1.2, and on what timeframe we wish to ship it.
What are our major concerns for Wicket 1.2?
I just list a few things I think could be on the feature list:
- reference documentation
- database integration
- session size/state management
- single component markup generation
- portal support
- testing
I also think we should aim for some release date. I would like us to
focus on smaller releases, and maybe strive for 4 releases per year.
Currently we are at 2.1 releases per year. My proposal is to do
time-boxed, feature driven development, aiming for high quality and
less focus on more features per release. Having a schedule of 4
releases, means releasing each 3 months. Currently a typical release
candidate is out there for about 3 weeks, and we usually have 2
release candidates. This means the last 6 weeks are RC time. This is
half of a 3 month release, and seems too much IMO.
Your thoughts please?
Martijn
--
Living a wicket life...
Martijn Dashorst - http://www.jroller.com/page/dashorst
Wicket 1.1 is out: http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-1.1
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
