Sorry for replying late. I'm with Igor, except that I don't care about maven 2. If it doesn't cost too much time, it's fine, otherwise forget it.
Eelco On 2/1/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > heh... I actually finished the message earlier than expected. Now... that > would be nice to happen with the Wicket book :) > > Yes the end of February is what I meant. Especially since there has been > little response so far to this message. > > Martijn > > > On 2/1/06, Francis Amanfo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No Igor, he meant by the end of January since his mail was dated 31 > January. Actually you only had some hours to finish your work. So can I > download 1.2 final now, since today is 1 february. I went to sourceforge but > couldn't find 1.2 final. Where is the meat? :) > > > > Just kidding, guys :) > > > > Francis > > > > > > > > On 2/1/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > On 1/31/06, Martijn Dashorst < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Devs, > > > > > > > > - Igor's multiple components, ajax generating thing (don't know how > > > > to call it, sorry Igor) -> do or don't > > > > > > > > > i think this is a do. its not too far off, and it will add a wow factor > to 1.2 > > > > > > > > > > - To be cleaned up api's (is there anything that needs work) > > > > > > > > > while im implementing the partial rerender i will clean up our current > AjaxHandler which looks like it was written for 1.1 with some patches to > make it compile with 1.2 > > > > > > > > > > - Bugs (1.2 should be delivered with a clean slate) > > > > > > > > > lets hope so :) > > > > > > > > > > - Documentation + examples > > > > > > > > > yes please > > > > > > > > > > - maven 2 build > > > > > > > > > i would like to have maven 2 support, but i know this is time consuming > because our site gen is a totally custom job. my vote would be to have maven > 2 support w/out site gen support (which our users prob wont need anyways). i > use maven 2 for all my new projects and transient dependencies are nice. > > > > > > there is also the model rework that johan and i have been discussing. > that should def go into 1.2. to reiterate, it introduces > modelObjectChanging/Changed methods that will allow us to better decide when > the model should be cloned or only the model object. this will fix the cases > in which PropertyModels are broken. > > > > > > > > > > I'd like us to have 1.2 finalized before the end of the month. I'm > > > > positive this is feasable if we stop tinkering and put our stamp on > > > > it. > > > > > > > > > you mean by the end of february? > > > -Igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Living a wicket life... > > Martijn Dashorst - http://www.jroller.com/page/dashorst > > Wicket 1.1.1 is out: > http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-1.1 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
