Hi
I'm not sure I understand. The idea with this assert is to check that a
component has been added to an AjaxRequestTarget and not to check
whether a specific Ajax event is fired.
We use this assert to check that the code we have written actually does
what we expect.
So if we have:
...
new AjaxLink("onclick") {
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
MyComponent my = new MyComponent("someid");
...
target.addComponent(my);
}
}
...
we use the assert to check that we have actually called
target.addComponent().
Regards
Frank Bille
On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 11:12 +0200, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> I don't think this is a good idea, you can have requests that don't
> update something in the page. Or nothing has been updated.
>
> I could envision an ajax 'keep session alive' auto update component,
> that doesn't update the webpage, but does a request each 10 minutes or
> so.
>
> Just like a page: a page doesn't have to have components attached to it.
>
> Martijn
>
> On 6/24/06, SourceForge.net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Patches item #1511607, was opened at 2006-06-24 00:32
> > Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
> > You can respond by visiting:
> > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684977&aid=1511607&group_id=119783
> >
> > Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
> > thread,
> > including the initial issue submission, for this request,
> > not just the latest update.
> > Category: core
> > Group: None
> > Status: Open
> > Resolution: None
> > Priority: 5
> > Submitted By: Frank Bille Jensen (billen)
> > Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
> > Summary: Assert that a component has been added to AjaxRequestTarget
> >
> > Initial Comment:
> > Added a method to WicketTester. Use this to test that a
> > component has actually been added to an
> > AjaxRequestTarget. It does it by checking the response
> > if it's an AJAX response and if the component's markup
> > id is present in the response.
> >
> > Attached are patches for 1.2 and 2.0. I believe this
> > could be used in 1.2 since it doesn't introduce any API
> > break, but just extends it.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > You can respond by visiting:
> > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684977&aid=1511607&group_id=119783
> >
> > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> > easier
> > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wicket-develop mailing list
> > Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
> >
>
>
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
