I'm fine with you committing anything you think makes Wicket better. What's the change exactly though? And the problem it solved?
Eelco On 7/7/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I finally got rid of WicketTag and would like to commit the code. It > is mostly related to markup handling and the changes should be wicket > internal only except for people who wrote there own resolvers. But I > guess that are only very few. Any objections against committing it to > 2.0`? > > Juergen > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-develop mailing list > Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
