I don't know yet. All I know now is that I'd like to have this on our list to try to fix/ solve. We'll nail down the details when we get there (unless you want to give it a shot now :)).
Eelco On 8/2/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what input params should that factory method have? > I guess the page else you don't have any context for what you create it. > And with a factory method you could just return a current instance of the > Window object. > > I am not a big fan of cloning the complete page. Because this could lead to > all kind of models > being out of sync (if the dev does keep reference to the page itself > somewhere). > If we removed the pagemap (that can only be done if we remove the > AccesStackPageMap) > then i would prefer not to clone the page..But just to attach it somehow to > the right window. > We needed to clone it with pagemaps because of the storing of the page (it > was really tight to it) > > johan > > > > > On 8/2/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 8/2/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But what data do you have in that Window 1? > > And what happens if i just open that in a different window? > > Will that then suddenly be windows 2?? > > Exactly! It's a different window, and as it is new, some factory > method would be called, probably by default trying to clone the window > of the last rendered page or something. > > > > > I still think that it is a different thing the serverside "window" thing > and > > the > > client side window thing. > > A server side window thing can be in any window on the client side. > > No, they can't, that's my whole point. They *should* be one-to-one, > and currently, unless you deliberately circumvent our window.name > check, this is exactly how it works. > > > Only pages made for that window (the functionality) do have that window > > object > > for some data. > > At least i guess now that window object has state? Because if that is the > > case > > i don't like cloning that. That could be very confusing for developers > > Then we don't do that. I'm neutral on that as long as we provide an > easy mechanism for customizing window creation (the factory method). > > Eelco > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-develop mailing list > Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-develop mailing list > Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
