On 8/14/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i think 1 is trivial and should not be part of the core. our api has a > pretty large surface for the users to learn already and i dont think we need > to throw such things in.
I would usually agree with that, but in this case I'd be +1 for the addition. TagModifier looks a lot better to me than WebMarkupContainer, the latter being a base class, and TagModifier's name only implying it is for a specific purpose. *If* we would agree to put this in the project, we state in it's API docs that it is not mean for anything else. Eelco ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
