On 8/19/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -1 for core +1 for extensions
It wouldn't make sense to me to put this in extensions. I'm +1 only for core. Otherwise I wouldn't bother. > i think you are actually doing the newbies a disservice by providing this. > these are elementary concepts they need to master. I understand your point but I don't agree. TagModifier would be much better alternative to using WebMarkupContainer. Yes, people *could* make their own. But they don't. We don't either, as examples but also e.g. Teachscape is pretty dense with WebMarkupContainers with attrib mods attached to it. *My* whole agreement with Jonathan is not so much that it saves some code - which is the main argument of some of the other convenience components - but just that we then have a component to express a common cause with a name that very clearly communicates it's intend. Re the elementary concepts.. you mean they have to learn about creating custom components or how to use attribute modifiers or both? I don't think having this component will have a large effect on that either way. So... +1 for core, or -1 otherwise. Eelco ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
