+1 on backporting (doesn't break the API/ drastically changes behavior, right?)
Eelco On 9/5/06, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey > > If you just take you time to skim the bug report[1] then I would like to > know if it would be ok to backport the fix (the patch attached to it or > revision 7227 in svn) to 1.x and therefore 1.2. It would be ok for 1.3 I > think, but it would also be quite good for 1.2 because it would *maybe* fix > a lot of problems the user could have with non-closed input streams. > > So: +/- on backporting it to 1.x (1.2)? > > Frank > > [1]: http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1543832 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-develop mailing list > Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
