Last last objections? Eelco
On 9/16/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah. We should remove that. Any last objections? > > Eelco > > On 9/16/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I hope so. Anyway, why is 1.2 still in svn? shouldn't it be removed by > > now? Martijn? > > > > -Matej > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop