Gili wrote: > I think it is safe to say that I am talking about Wicket as I have > seen it last: which is version 0.9.19 and a little peeks into CVS. > Anytime I discuss anything about it, I am discussing based upon public > releases. I don't expect that to change.
OK, then we are clear about that. Perhaps we are sometimes too thick headed to realize people actually use a released version ;-). > If you feel you have fixed all the problems I have reported then > great! Let us know about it by documenting it and making an official > release. We are working on the official release. But would you be interested in a nightly build (or a cruisecontrol build), so you can keep up with CVS head, without having to build it yourself? > But please don't expect me to magically know what goes on under the > hood in CVS :) I am not part of the Wicket core team. I don't know > about all the chat sessions you guys have online outside the scope of > the mailing list or fixes commited to CVS. And to a certain degree, I > prefer it this way because right now Wicket is not my core project; my > website is. *Grin*, sometimes the number of messages make /me/ think you are a core developer ;-). I'll try to keep that in mind. > I am not omnipotent :) None of us are... With regards, Martijn Dashorst ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
