+1 for 1.1 from me, too. Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> Lots of fixes and improvements this week. That's good. It getting > harder to maintain the 1.0 branch though. The plan was not to do any > API breaking fixes in that, but with the validator changes of today > that gets impossible. > > Who /needs/ the 1.0 to be supported? My hope is that as you'll have > some API breaks anyway, you might as well do the full upgrade to 1.1. > Saves us a lot of work (that we can better spend at fixing issues and > honouring requests), and gives you JavaScript/CSS functionality! And > it doesn't break much more. > > So, if you absolutely need the 1.0 branch to be supported, please > speak up now :) Otherwise, we'll be focussing on 1.1. instead. > > Eelco > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies > from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, > informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to > speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
