#: Eelco Hillenius changed the world a bit at a time by saying on  8/19/2005 
3:06 PM :#
Don't know yet :) Lets see if there are more people that want to participate. 
And we would have to pick some time that would work for people across time 
zones.
Eelco

Not yet a Wicket user, but looking to ;-). I would like to participate: GMT + 2 
here.

:alex |.::the_mindstorm::.|

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Koen Serry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: vr 19-8-2005 14:56 Aan: [email protected] CC: Onderwerp: Re: [Wicket-user] Spring Integration
        
        

        I'd like to participate,
        what irc server/channel?
        
        Koen
        
        Eelco Hillenius wrote:
        
        >We could even have an online conference (IRC) with the people who are 
interested/ want to contribute to this topic. We (core devs) sometimes work like 
that, and I find it really boosting to brainstorm like that and write some code 
right away. Interested? This weekend?
        >
        >Eelco
        >
        >
        >       -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
        >       Van: Eelco Hillenius
        >       Verzonden: vr 19-8-2005 14:50
        >       Aan: [email protected]; 
[email protected]
        >       CC:
        >       Onderwerp: RE: [Wicket-user] Spring Integration
> > >
        >       I haven't looked in-depth at the Spring stuff, but there seem 
to be a couple of different view points around when it comes to Spring 
integration. Maybe we should start a Wiki item on this topicus. More specifically:
        >       - What do people want to achieve? What kind of wiring would 
they like to be done by Spring? Wire DAOs etc to their pages? Or have them 
immediately available from your pages (service lookup)? And do you want fancy 
configuration of your WebApplication class done by Spring (I guess that's no 
problem at all now), and are there other things people want to do.
> > Discussing on this list is more convenient, but by creating a Wiki item, we might make the specs more persistent. > > Eelco > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
        >               Van: Koen Serry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >               Verzonden: vr 19-8-2005 14:33
        >               Aan: [email protected]
        >               CC:
        >               Onderwerp: Re: [Wicket-user] Spring Integration
> > > Hi > > I did before posting to this mailing list, but as I found the construct a bit weird to me I was thinking if an alternative would be possible. > > Like the SpringApplicationController creates a new instance of the servlet to then assign the application to it, or the SpringContextLocator is implemented as a singleton/factory requiring the page to pass the request to it. > > I was just wondering if this could be a plausable alternative since it seems like a lot of overhead just to get to the applicationContext. > > Koen > > Juergen Donnerstag wrote: > > please have a look at sourceforge project wicket-stuff which contains
        >                       additional higher level component. It contains 
also a modul with
        >                       different alternatives on how to integrate with 
Spring. I think there
        >                       is even a example application in there.
> > Juergen > > On 8/19/05, Koen Serry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I've been looking into Wicket for a couple of days now and I have to say
        >                               I like what I see so far from a web 
framework point of view.
        >                               However I have a couple 
remarks/questions with regards to Spring
        >                               integration or IOC integration in 
general for that matter.
> > So far I've been using tapestry and in tapestry 3 it was pretty easy,
        >                               you subclassed the engine class, put 
the applicationContext in it, and
        >                               from whatever page-class you could 
access it. In Tapestry 4 however,
        >                               they haven't found a clean way so 
that's one of the reasons I was moving
        >                               to Wicket.
> > Now would it be possible to keep some kind of global(Map) in Wicket as a
        >                               way of putting/getting 'other' items in 
the Application?
        >                               Since you're pretty much required to 
subclass the Application class and
        >                               it gets initialized with the 
WicketServlet pretty much immediately. This
        >                               would allow the ApplicationContext of 
spring or some frequently used
        >                               items like a sessionFactory of 
Hibernate (if you didn't want to use
        >                               Spring) to be easely accessed from each 
page to be used. As then the
        >                               only thing it would require is like 
getApplication().get("spring") or if
        >                               you'd use ognl 
getApplication().get("spring.mydao").
> > What do you guys think? > > Koen Serry
        >                               http://www.serry.org
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------
        >                               SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better 
Software Conference & EXPO
        >                               September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, 
CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
        >                               Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing 
Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
        >                               Security * Process Improvement & 
Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
        >                               
_______________________________________________
        >                               Wicket-user mailing list
        >                               [email protected]
        >                               
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------
        >                       SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software 
Conference & EXPO
        >                       September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * 
Development Lifecycle Practices
        >                       Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects 
& Teams * Testing & QA
        >                       Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * 
http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
        >                       _______________________________________________
        >                       Wicket-user mailing list
        >                       [email protected]
        >                       
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > > > HS^隊XJ'u^׫J
        >       zq<䞦צmmNRjqkjw"7zZ).'s'%xr؜z Wî+ޜ7zZ)1ڂ)>#ylM榱7)@r#Ǭޙ1欺z{a 
0o۱ǹrGǫx%VX(~zwilqzlX)ߣ"rGǫ
        >
> >
        
        
        
        -------------------------------------------------------
        SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
        September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle 
Practices
        Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & 
QA
        Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * 
http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
        _______________________________________________
        Wicket-user mailing list
        [email protected]
        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
        




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to