Did you compile with maven? If so, you should check if the dependency
on wicket is of the right version.

Eelco


On 10/3/05, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tried compiling it and got 41 errors.  Here's the first few:
>
>      [javac] Compiling 360 source files to
> /Users/nick/extsrc/cvs/wicket/target/classes
>      [javac]
> /Users/nick/extsrc/cvs/wicket/src/java/wicket/markup/html/form/Form.java:39:
> package wicket.util.upload does not exist
>      [javac] import wicket.util.upload.FileUploadException;
>      [javac]                           ^
>      [javac]
> /Users/nick/extsrc/cvs/wicket/src/java/wicket/markup/html/form/Form.java:40:
> package wicket.util.upload.FileUploadBase does not exist
>      [javac] import
> wicket.util.upload.FileUploadBase.SizeLimitExceededException;
>      [javac]                                          ^
>      [javac]
> /Users/nick/extsrc/cvs/wicket/src/java/wicket/DefaultPageFactory.java:27:
> package wicket.util.concurrent does not exist
>      [javac] import
> wicket.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap;
>      [javac]                               ^
>      [javac]
> /Users/nick/extsrc/cvs/wicket/src/java/wicket/protocol/http/WebRequestCycle.java:43:
> package wicket.protocol.http.servlet does not exist
>      [javac] import
> wicket.protocol.http.servlet.ServletWebRequest;
>      [javac]                                     ^
>      [javac]
> /Users/nick/extsrc/cvs/wicket/src/java/wicket/markup/html/form/persistence/CookieValuePersister.java:29:
> package wicket.protocol.http.servlet does not exist
>      [javac] import
> wicket.protocol.http.servlet.ServletWebRequest;
>      [javac]                                     ^
>      [javac]
> /Users/nick/extsrc/cvs/wicket/src/java/wicket/markup/html/form/upload/FileUpload.java:27:
> package wicket.util.upload does not exist
>      [javac] import wicket.util.upload.FileItem;
>
>
>  Are there compilation instructions that I missed?
>
>
> On 10/2/05, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Somebody else did.
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1290843&group_id=119783&atid=684975
> >
> > I guess I'll try HEAD.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10/2/05, Eelco Hillenius < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What is broken about the DatePicker? Did you file a bug for that? It's
> > > hard to remember/ search through all those emails, so the source forge
> > > issue trackers are a good way to make sure we won't forget about bugs.
> > >
> > > DatePicker (multiple instances) works fine for me with HEAD. I don't
> > > use borders though.
> > >
> > > Eelco
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/2/05, Nick Heudecker < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I'm using 1.1-b4 because the DatePicker is broken in 1.1-rc1.
> Currently, I
> > > > have a BasePage that adds a Border.  The Border looks like:
> > > >
> > > >  <wicket:border>
> > > >      <html>
> > > >          <head>
> > > >              <link wicket:id="pageCSS" rel="Stylesheet"
> type="text/css"
> > > > href="styles/default.css"/>
> > > >              <wicket:head>
> > > >                  <script type="text/javascript"
> > > > src="js/helpers.js"></script>
> > > >              </wicket:head>
> > > >          </head>
> > > >          <body>
> > > >              <div align="center">
> > > >                  <table class="user">
> > > >                      <tr>
> > > >                          <td align="right">
> > > >                              .....
> > > >                          </td>
> > > >                      </tr>
> > > >                  </table>
> > > >                  <table class="top" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
> > > >                      <tr>
> > > >                          <th colspan="2">
> > > >                              <span
> > > > wicket:id="companyName">Foo</span>
> > > >                          </th>
> > > >                      </tr>
> > > >                      <tr class="tabrow">
> > > >                          <span
> wicket:id="navigationHeader">
> > > >                          .....
> > > >                          </span>
> > > >                      </tr>
> > > >                      <tr>
> > > >                          <td colspan="2">
> > > >                              <table
> class="contenttable">
> > > >                                  <wicket:body/>
> > > >                              </table>
> > > >                          </td>
> > > >                      </tr>
> > > >                  </table>
> > > >              </div>
> > > >          </body>
> > > >      </html>
> > > >  </wicket:border>
> > > >
> > > >  The BasePage is then subclassed by application classes.  That's
> basically
> > > > my setup.  Should I move something to a BasePage.html file and inherit
> the
> > > > markup?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 10/2/05, Juergen Donnerstag < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > > This sounds like a bug, but I can not reproduce it. Which wicket
> > > > > version are you using? How does your page and the components look
> > > > > like? May be you can strip down the page and send the remaining (but
> > > > > important) parts to me?
> > > > >
> > > > > Juergen
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10/2/05, Nick Heudecker < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > I don't see the message in the user list archives, so I'll repost
> the
> > > > body:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  Why does the content of wicket:head show up in two places in my
> > > > generated
> > > > > > markup?  If I have something like:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  <html>
> > > > > >  <head>
> > > > > >  <wicket:head>
> > > > > >  <script src="..."/>
> > > > > >  </wicket:head>
> > > > > >  </head>
> > > > > >  ....
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  The markup will generate as:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  <head>
> > > > > >  <wicket:head>
> > > > > >  <script src="..."/>
> > > > > >  </wicket:head>
> > > > > >  </head>
> > > > > >  <html>
> > > > > >  <head>
> > > > > >  <wicket:head>
> > > > > >  <script src="..."/>
> > > > > >  </wicket:head>
> > > > > >  </head>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  This really screws up a number of Javascript components.  Any way
> to
> > > > get
> > > > > > this to only generate once?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  Also, how can I add content to wicket:head from a Page component?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 10/2/05, Juergen Donnerstag < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > might you please provide me the details of your <wicket:head>
> problem
> > > > > > > again. thanks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Juergen
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 10/2/05, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I wasn't sure if it was an issue or I was just doing something
> dumb.
> > > > > > Let me
> > > > > > > > know and I'll file it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 10/2/05, Eelco Hillenius < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Did you file that as an issue?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Eelco
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 10/2/05, Nick Heudecker < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > It looks like I don't have to write an integration
> component for
> > > > > > Wicket
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > TinyMCE. (I couldn't get FCKeditor working as easily as
> > > > TinyMCE.)
> > > > > > Some
> > > > > > > > > > JavaScript in the <wicket:head> is enough to configure the
> > > > component
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > do
> > > > > > > > > > what I need.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >  However, for everything to work properly, my earlier
> question
> > > > about
> > > > > > > > > > wicket:head rendering twice needs to get resolved.  Any
> takers?
> > > > :)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> > > > > > > > > Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads,
> > > > > > discussions,
> > > > > > > > > and more.
> > > > http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
> > > > > > > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > > > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> > > > > > > Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads,
> > > > discussions,
> > > > > > > and more.
> http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> > > > > Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads,
> discussions,
> > > > > and more.
> http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> > > Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads,
> discussions,
> > > and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > >
> >
> >
>
>


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to