I agree with Matej. Eelco
On 10/30/05, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In my opinion, there's no need for another indirection. From what I've > seen, new users are already confused about models, making them even more > complicated isn't imho the way to go. > > I think that Ognl models should be separated from the core and put to > extensions. That would also get rid of ognl as a dependecy. > > Just my 2c. > > -Matej > > Johan Compagner wrote: > > Ok now we released 1.1 i have committed the ognl replacement > > It is not yet plugable yet we first need to see what we will or can > > support to bring back ognl for specific things. > > (plugable or in wicket extentions as its own model?) > > > > > > This is the current javadoc it explains what is possible now: > > > > This class parses expressions to lookup or set a value on the object > > that is given. > > The supported expressions are: > > > > "property": This can can then be a bean property with get and set > > method. Or if a map is given as an object it will be lookup with the > > property as a key when there is not get method for that property. > > > > "property1.property2": Both properties are lookup as written above. If > > property1 evaluates to null then if there is a setMethod (or if it is a > > map) and the Class of the property has a default constructor then the > > object will be constructed and set on the object. > > > > "property.index": If the property is a List or Array then the second > > property can be a index on that list like: 'mylist.0' this expression > > will also map on a getProperty(index) or setProperty(index,value) > > methods. If the object is a List then the list will grow automaticaly if > > the index is greater then the size > > > > Index or map properties can also be written as: "property[index]" or > > "property[key]" > > > > On 10/28/05, *Phil Kulak* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > wrote: > > > > I like the idea of being able to plug in OGNL if you really need it. > > Now that I think about it, I've got a couple ChoiceRenderers that call > > functions using OGNL. Although, it probably would be very easy to > > rewrite these by just implementing the interface myself, and much more > > efficient. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. > > Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course > > Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 > > Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information > > _______________________________________________ > > Wicket-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. > Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course > Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 > Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
