On Dec 4, 2005, at 12:22 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: On 12/4/05, Gili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just being a little picky: can we redefine mountBookmarkablePage() so
it is (sourceClass, targetURL) similar to the preexisting format of
putClassAlias()? I find it easier to read that way.
personally i like to see the path first, but im not that attached to it. if more ppl want this we can make the change.
I vote no change, I like the new method parameters the way they are :). As far as I'm concerned it doesn't really matter, as the 2 methods served completely different purposes. One meant to shorten the FQN to something more bearable, and the other to define a pretty path.
Secondly, I read the TODO in the "niceurl" example. Is the mounting
feature usable yet? Some of the concerns in the TODO seems to hint
otherwise...? Or did you guys resolve this yet? the only show stopper is number 1. 2 and 3 are nice-to-haves. 1 is being worked on. there is already a solution that uses <base> tag that works, but we are working on an alternate completely transparent solution. net effect will be the same for non-portlet apps. see this thread for necessary code to make this work until the transparent solution is in place (which should be very soon) http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg06084.html-Igor
|
- Re: [Wicket-user] niceurl support Andrew Lombardi
-
