Martijn Dashorst wrote:

I think there are different types of designers... Our company design team (2 people) use photoshop to create the design, and one of them transforms that into HTML + CSS + JavaScript for a mockup website.

Well, the first is the creative designer. This guys is drawing the picture. The WEB designer must be capable of turning that into whatever (X)HTML versione you want + CSS + Javascript or whatever. I've rarely seen a guy able to fullfill both the above roles. That's because the creative designers tend to be (some think that they are :-D ) somewhat of an artist, they have few clues on how to actually implement what they've just drawn. On the other hand the WEB designer has too few clues on how to draw a nice WEB GUI but given one (a picture, a PSD file, whatever), he'll transpose that into HTML markup + css + javascript or whatever. It would be the ideal case when one single person could do the both as it would be ideal that the same guy does the Java programming :-D. Unfortunatelly that is far from reality and I think that it is not even desirable.

This is then presented to our customer, and then turned over to the development team.

We are fortunate that our HTML designer is very capable of CSS + HTML and that gives very clean markup. We are also fortunate that the designer doesn't shy away from CVS usage.

There's a big difference between a frontpage designer and a web designer knowing what he is producing. The difference is the same as between the 'VB code monkeys' and a pragmatic programmer. The former only knows how to press buttons and make pretty pictures, but hasn't got a clue as to what happens in the background. The latter is a true craftsman, preciously working on his skills to improve himself, his knowledge and the products he's producing.

Martijn


On 12/12/05, *Michael Jouravlev* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    On 12/11/05, Andrew Lombardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
    > Programmers work in Java, Designers work in HTML, wicket follows the
    > separation of concerns fairly eloquently.

    This is a wrong principle. Modern-day web programming is not a CGI
    script + HTML 2.0. Web browsers are capable of Javascript, DOM, CSS,
    XML parsing, XSLT and other stuff. Designers cannot do that. This is
    programmers' job. Never before web dev was so fun (and gore) as it in
    last two-three years. And it will get better. That is why I think that
    JSF and such are very unflexible, they spit out predefined HTML,
    sometimes not really pretty one, and they do not allow to use the
    full
    power of modern client web development.

    Michael.


    -------------------------------------------------------
    This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through
    log files
    for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
    searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD
    SPLUNK!
    http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&opclick
    <http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id%16865&opclick>
    _______________________________________________
    Wicket-user mailing list
    Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
    <mailto:Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
    <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user>




--
Living a wicket life...

Martijn Dashorst - http://www.jroller.com/page/dashorst

Wicket 1.1 is out: http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-1.1




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to