#: Igor Vaynberg changed the world a bit at a time by saying (astral date:
2/9/2006 6:46 PM) :#
the problem with writing integration for acegi is that its such a beast.
there is a 1000 ways to integrate with it, so how can we write a single
authentication implementation that can handle all 1000 ways?
i think we can provide a base implementation for what we think is the most
common use of it, and then youd have to take it from there and customize it
for your particular needs.
-Igor
I guess another possible approach would be to open up some integration doors. Than everybody will be
able to follow whatever approach he wants from those 1000 ways.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 2/9/06, Dorel Vaida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Johan Compagner wrote:
> the planning is that 1.2 will be released within 2 months (i hope
> within 1 but that is maybe a bit to much)
>
> We have now a Security framework (better said security interfaces)
> inside wicket. Where a implementation can be attached to
> (like jaas or acegi i guess)
> There is currently not a real implementation build on acegi as far as
> i know. But i guess it just have to be build as an implementation of
> the current security interafaces.
>
> Why do you require to use Acegi?
Because it has been designed for Spring (and I use Spring on almost all
the projects ) and it allows you to design these incredible powerfull
security schemes going down to method level etc. Because it's an
incredible powerful security package and I trust it. And finally because
it's a requirement that would make a particular customer happy :-)
>
> johan
>
>
> On 2/8/06, *Dorel Vaida* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> Hi there, without any intention to create presure, I would want to
ask
> if the version 1.2 of Wicket provides integration with the Acegi
> security framework (as stated in the roadmap for Wicket 1.2). Also
I'd
> like to ask if the 1.2 final release will be delayed more than 2, or
3
> months from now. I'm asking this because my next project
requirements
> include the use of Acegi as the security framework for the web
> tier and
> I estimate the development to last at least 3 months and I'd like
> to go
> into production with a stable version of Wicket. It'll influence my
> decision of working with Wicket 1.2, 1.1 or if I will even choose
> Wicket
> for the project.
>
> Thanks alot.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through
> log files
> for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD
> SPLUNK!
>
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
> <
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642>
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
