#: Eelco Hillenius changed the world a bit at a time by saying (astral date:
2/9/2006 8:10 AM) :#
On second thought, please do volunteer. I was informed that we
actually need a couple of proof readers pretty soon. I'll contact you
about this later.
Thanks!
Eelco
Hope I am still on your list :-).
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 2/8/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for your offer, but that is really something for the publisher
to decide. When the time comes, we might propose such a thing on this
list. But at this time, we are just not far enough with the book.
Eelco
On 2/8/06, Frank Silbermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can I volunteer to be a reader of early drafts? Though readers with
> deep understanding of Wicket's implementation and intended use will be
> essential to make sure you get the details right, as a new Wicket user I
> may be in a better position to recognize weaknesses in the presentation.
> (I.e., if it's not explained well, I won't understand it.)
>
> Frank Silbermann
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco
> Hillenius
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 3:39 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 ?
>
> The book will be up-to-date. With at least 1.2.
>
> Eelco
>
>
> On 2/8/06, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > #: Johan Compagner changed the world a bit at a time by saying (astral
> date: 2/8/2006 4:19 PM) :#
> > > the planning is that 1.2 will be released within 2 months (i hope
> within 1
> > > but that is maybe a bit to much)
> > >
> >
> > A week ago Martijn was talking about end of month, and now it is going
> 2 months :-(. I am also
> > wondering if the book will have 1.2 information.
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > ./alex
> > --
> > .w( the_mindstorm )p.
> >
> >
> > > We have now a Security framework (better said security interfaces)
> inside
> > > wicket. Where a implementation can be attached to
> > > (like jaas or acegi i guess)
> > > There is currently not a real implementation build on acegi as far
> as i
> > > know. But i guess it just have to be build as an implementation of
> the
> > > current security interafaces.
> > >
> > > Why do you require to use Acegi?
> > >
> > > johan
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/8/06, Dorel Vaida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi there, without any intention to create presure, I would want to
> ask
> > >> if the version 1.2 of Wicket provides integration with the Acegi
> > >> security framework (as stated in the roadmap for Wicket 1.2). Also
> I'd
> > >> like to ask if the 1.2 final release will be delayed more than 2,
> or 3
> > >> months from now. I'm asking this because my next project
> requirements
> > >> include the use of Acegi as the security framework for the web tier
> and
> > >> I estimate the development to last at least 3 months and I'd like
> to go
> > >> into production with a stable version of Wicket. It'll influence my
> > >> decision of working with Wicket 1.2, 1.1 or if I will even choose
> Wicket
> > >> for the project.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks alot.
> > >>
> > >>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
