Michael Day wrote: > If not, then wicket cannot be used for public web sites (news, > online store, etc) that need to be indexed in today's search engines.
Johan Compagner wrote: > If you want a really stateless page/site. Then everything must be > bookmarkable/mountable links..and you can't use our > form components [...] Yes. Ample bookmarkable links are all you need for good indexing. Try googling "British Lemon Meringue Pie" and see that the second result is in fact a Wicket demo application. I wouldn't worry about forms too much since Google doesn't follow them anyway. As long as you can get to the content through bookmarkable links, it will be indexed. The fact that a session always exists is irrelevant and entirely normal. (Even ASP 3.0 created a session on the "very first hit.") My only wish is to get rid of that silly ;jsessionid=66kiemewvs53 but I don't think that's up to Wicket. Nathan ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
