On 4/21/06, Vincent Jenks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 - it's certainly easier on the eyes.
On 4/21/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> we can deprecate the existing one and have it forward to the new one as not
> to break the api. then remove the deprecated method once 1.2 is out of the
> door.
>
> -Igor
>
>
>
> On 4/21/06, cowwoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >
> > I vote in favor of renaming setUseOptimizedItemRemoval() to
> > setReuseItems() because I feel it is more descriptive of what it
> > actually does. What do the rest of you think?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gili
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--
Wicket 1.2 is coming! Write Ajax applications without touching _javascript_!
-- http://wicketframework.org
