Well, people can still argue whether it is in Google's way or not. See
my comment at 
http://technically.us/n8/articles/2006/05/07/baking-for-google#comments

A session will still be created, even if you only have bookmarkable
pages. We tried to get rid of it, but it prooved undoable at this
time.

If you have bookmarkable pages without any callbacks (like internal
links and forms etc) on them, they won't be stored in the session. You
can achieve 'near statelessness' by coding all your bookmarkable pages
like that, only use links to other bookmarkable pages (or to the same
but as a bookmarkable link using parameters). However, if you plan to
code your whole application like that, you should consider whether
Wicket is the right framework for you, as having stateful components
is the big idea of the framework.

Eelco


On 6/7/06, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering what the current state of wicket is regarding not
> adding a JSESSIONID to pages served to search engine bots?  Also, are
> http sessions still created if I use only bookmarkable pages and
> don't want to store any application session state?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>


_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to