I thought that was the point of 2.0--to break the API for a better product. =D
Michael Day On Jun 8, 2006, at 6:17 PM, Eelco Hillenius wrote: > I'm just about to check in changes that - finally - lets Wicket defer > session creation until it is actually needed. The change is done for > 2.0/ trunk, but we're currently voting on whether it is worth an API > break. IBehavior has one additional method. If you haven't been > reading the API docs not to implement that interface directly (and I > wouldn't know any advantage to do that), it means you don't have a > drop in. > > So before you do a lot of work, you might want to wait until we're > done voting. > > Eelco > > > > On 6/8/06, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On 8 Jun 2006, at 09:52, Johan Compagner wrote: >> >>> you could return your own versions of ISessionStore >>> that pretty much doesn't do anything.. >>> Dont know if that always works.. >> >> Thanks, I think I will try this approach and see what happens! I >> will be building a new site in the next month or two which will be a >> good experiment. If it all works out I will convert the rest of my >> main site from Webwork to Wicket. I want to wait for 2.0 to become a >> little more stable first and base it on that. >> >> John. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wicket-user mailing list >> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > > _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
