On 6/8/06, Timo Stamm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Patterson schrieb: > > Currently, I am considering either apache url rewriting to remove all > > session ids from non-conversational pages or hacking wicket to disable > > url encoding for all pages that do not absolutely require a session. > > Are you sure this issue is that important? In my experience, Google does > index pages with a session id parameter in the URL. The session id is > stripped in the search result URL, so I don't see any problems. Even if > there is any penalty, it is probably much more important to have good > content. > > > Timo >
Unfortunately this is not completely accurate information. Google indeed indexes pages with jsessionid in their URLs, but it is not stripping it. Due to this, same page (retrieved through same URL, but containing different jsessionid-s) will have their page ranks computed independently. that's what I know about googlebot, ./alex -- :Architect of InfoQ.com: .w( the_mindstorm )p. _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
