No such luck - that didn't work any better.

when doing 'mvn install' in the top-level WICKET_1_2 directory I get this error:

Downloading: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-container-
default/1.0-alpha-8/plexus-container-default-1.0-alpha-8.pom
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM).


Project ID: org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-container-default

Reason: Error getting POM for 'org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-container-default' fro
m the repository: Error transferring file
  org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-container-default:pom:1.0-alpha-8

from the specified remote repositories:
  central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2),
  apache.snapshots (http://svn.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository),
  snapshots (http://snapshots.maven.codehaus.org/maven2)

So, just for the sake of completeness I cd'd into the lower 'wicket'
directory and ran 'mvn install' and got this:

[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Failed to resolve artifact.

Error transferring file
  org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:maven-plugin:2.2

from the specified remote repositories:
  central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2)


Caused by I/O exception: Server returned HTTP response code: 503 for URL: http:/
/repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/2.2/maven
-surefire-plugin-2.2.jar.sha1

Sounds like it might be better in concept than Ant but you run the
risk of not being able to download dependencies - not sure I like the
idea of relying on an internet connection for them.

Anyhow...no closer than I was before.

Any ideas?

On 7/7/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thats what i understood from martijn. the problem is that there is a parent
> pom file that all other projects inherit from, so that means that parent pom
> has to be installed in the maven repo in order for other projects to find it
> when you try to build
>
> so what i would do is
>
>
> cd WICKET_1_2
> mvn install  <<(possibly optional if you have the whole thing checked out)
>
> cd wicket
> mvn install
>
> and you should be good to go
>
> -Igor
>
>
>
>
>
> On 7/7/06, V. Jenks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, if I check out all projects at
> >
> https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket/tags/WICKET_1_2/
> > <
> https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket/tags/WICKET_1_2/wicket>
> I
> > should be able to build them w/ maven, as you described before?
> >
> > Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> > > svn co
> > >
> https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket/tags/WICKET_1_2/wicket
> will
> > > give you the 1.2 release
> > >
> > > maven doesnt work out of the box because of the new build thing
> > > martijn is trying where you need to have a parent pom installed first
> > > so its a more tedious process unless you check out the entire folder
> > > that contains all the projects.
> > >
> > > -Igor
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/7/06, *Vincent Jenks* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > >
> > >     Ha!  It ran w/o the exception!  It would have been nice to get
> around
> > >     the logging another way but I guess I'll take what I can get at this
> > >     point.
> > >
> > >     My last concern is - is 1.2.1.rc1 fit for production - because this
> > >     site is *already* in production and I'm hesitant to throw a
> relatively
> > >     unstable version of wicket into it.
> > >
> > >     Could someone help me figure out how to build the 1.2 final branch
> > >     w/o errors?
> > >
> > >     Thanks!
> > >
> > >     On 7/7/06, Vincent Jenks < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > >     > OK, by dropping junit into the ant/lib dir from another project
> that
> > >     > happened to have junit in it, I was able to build it.  Now I'll
> > >     test
> > >     > w/ the logging commented out.
> > >     >
> > >     > On 7/7/06, Vincent Jenks < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > >     > > OK...I've never done anything manually w/ ant that needed any
> > >     other
> > >     > > type of setup...so I'm sure I can't spend a lot of time on
> > >     that (today
> > >     > > at least).
> > >     > >
> > >     > > What about maven?  Why can't I build it?
> > >     > >
> > >     > > Is there another way for me to build it?
> > >     > >
> > >     > > On 7/7/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > >     > > > Then you probably don't have done the steps to setup ant...
> ant
> > >     > > > requires you to install the junit jar into the ant/lib
> > >     folder iirc.
> > >     > > >
> > >     > > > It's been a while since I've setup ant to work like this...
> > >     > > >
> > >     > > > Martijn
> > >     > > >
> > >     > > > On 7/7/06, V. Jenks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > >     > > > > I did steps 1-5...it immediately fails because there is no
> > >     build
> > >     > > > > file...so I went back up to the root where the build.xml
> > >     file was and
> > >     > > > > ran 'ant jar'...I eventually get this:
> > >     > > > >
> > >     > > > > BUILD FAILED
> > >     > > > > /home/vjenks/Projects/java/wicket-
> 1.2.1-rc1/build.xml:85:
> > >     Could not
> > >     > > > > create task or type of type: junit.
> > >     > > > >
> > >     > > > > Ant could not find the task or a class this task relies
> upon.
> > >     > > > >
> > >     > > > >
> > >     > > > > Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > >     > > > > > Instead of building from SVN, you might download the
> > >     distribution
> > >     > > > > > (1.2.1-rc1 is the newest), and use ant to build the jar.
> > >     > > > > >
> > >     > > > > > the distribution contains all dependencies you need, and
> > >     contains a
> > >     > > > > > build.xml for ant lovers.
> > >     > > > > >
> > >     > > > > > There is no need to learn yet another tool if you don't
> > >     want to.
> > >     > > > > >
> > >     > > > > > So the steps:
> > >     > > > > > 1. download wicket-1.2.1-rc1-bin.zip
> > >     > > > > > 2. unzip
> > >     > > > > > 3. cd into directory
> > >     > > > > > 4. do your changes in the src/java folder
> > >     > > > > > 5. start 'ant jar'
> > >     > > > > > 6. find the jar in the target directory (without version
> > >     number unfortunately)
> > >     > > > > >
> > >     > > > > > Martijn
> > >     > > > > >
> > >     > > > > >
> > >     > > > > > On 7/7/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >     <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >
> > >     > > > > >> the entire point of maven is that it downloads
> > >     dependencies for you and does
> > >     > > > > >> the rest of that crap so you dont have to :)
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >> -Igor
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >> On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>> I've heard of it but am not familiar...I'll look into
> it.
> > >     > > > > >>>
> > >     > > > > >>> I was going to make a lib project in eclipse or
> > >     netbeans and build it
> > >     > > > > >>> that way but realized there's probably a pile of
> > >     dependencies I don't
> > >     > > > > >>> have...won't that be an issue even w/ maven?
> > >     > > > > >>>
> > >     > > > > >>> All the lib folders only contain clover....
> > >     > > > > >>>
> > >     > > > > >>> On 7/6/06, Igor Vaynberg < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>>
> > >     > > > > >>>> naaah use maven2
> > >     > > > > >>>> make the change in the src folder
> > >     > > > > >>>> type "mvn package" and you will have a .jar ready in
> > >     the target dir
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>> -Igor
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>> On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >     <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>> OK, checked it out and I made my change....but bare
> > >     w/ me...I'm almost
> > >     > > > > >>>>> completely unfamiliar w/ Ant and I figured that'd be
> > >     the easiest way
> > >     > > > > >>>>> to build it?
> > >     > > > > >>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>> So, how do I build this sucker?
> > >     > > > > >>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>> On 7/6/06, Igor Vaynberg < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> well, if it comes down to it just check out wicket,
> > >     remove that
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> portion
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> of
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> code, and deploy it that way
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> -Igor
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >     <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>> At 8:30 this morning...it's now 2:30pm here and I
> > >     was the *last*
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>> person to post to this forum at all...which is
> > >     weird...it's
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> normally
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>> pretty busy.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >
> http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=16673&tstart=0
> > >
> <http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=16673&tstart=0
> >
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>> This is the first time I haven't gotten an answer
> > >     to my problem on
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> the
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>> same day...they're *almost* as good as you guys! :)
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Eelco Hillenius <
> > >     [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>> Did you try asking around on the glassfish list/
> > >     IRC channel (if
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>> they
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> have one)?
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>> Eelco
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks <
> > >     [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>> I have no idea...but I'm lost at this point.  I
> > >     have both
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>> commons-logging and log4j in the glassfish/lib
> > >     folder because
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> it
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> is a
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>> requirement for using Hibernate as the
> > >     persistence engine.  I
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> put
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> the
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>> log4j.properties in there w/ the suggested
> > >     entries and
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>> restarted...the
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>> error is the same - didn't work.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>> I tried deploying log4j in my war's /lib folder
> > >     and packaging
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>> log4j.properties in there...made no
> > >     difference...I can't get
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> the
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>> exception message to change.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>> ugh.... :(
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Matej Knopp < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Wicket uses commons-logging. I wonder whether
> > >     glassfish
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> doesn't
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> have
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>> it's own weird logger factory, just like jetty
> > >     does.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>> -Matej
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> In fact log4j.logger.wicket=INFO should be
> enough.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Eelco
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks
> > >     < [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> log4j.debug=false
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> log4j.rootLogger=INFO
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> log4j.logger.org=INFO
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> log4j.logger.com=INFO
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> log4j.logger.net=INFO
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> log4j.logger.nl=INFO
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> log4j.logger.wicket=INFO
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>
> log4j.logger.wicket.protocol.http.HttpSessionStore=INFO
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> log4j.logger.org.apache.catalina.cluster=INFO
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> log4j.logger.wicket.version=INFO
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> log4j.logger.wicket.RequestCycle=INFO
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> logger.wicket.protocol.http=INFO
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>
> log4j.appender.Stdout=org.apache.log4j.ConsoleAppender
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>
> log4j.appender.Stdout.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> log4j.appender.Stdout.layout.conversionPattern=%-5p
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> -
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> %- 26.26c{1} - %m\n
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Igor Vaynberg <
> > >     [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> paste your complete log4j.properties file
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -Igor
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks <
> > >     [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's where I put it - nothing changed so
> > >     you're
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> obviously
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> right...it
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't make a difference anyways.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmm...this is bad...this puts me in a rough
> > >     spot as I
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> have
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> no
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> idea how
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use a "spring like proxy" and am not at
> > >     all familiar
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> w/
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spring....and in effect I'd have no idea
> > >     how to do this
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> in
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> Wicket or
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what it would involve.  It's obviously
> > >     going to involve
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> me
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> reworking a
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bunch of my existing code just to move to
> > >     another
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> container...which
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> shouldn't have been the case.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Igor Vaynberg <
> > >     [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are doing it fine, you just have to find
> a
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> location
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> for
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> log4j.properties
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where glassfish will pick it up. usually
> > >     it is in
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> war/web-inf/classes
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Igor
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks <
> > >     [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For whatever reason, I'm unable to
> > >     supress this
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> exception
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> in
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> the
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> storefront application (where I really need
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> it.)  I've
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> tried
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> wrapping
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a try/catch around the assignment and
> > >     retrieval of
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> the
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> SFSB
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> stub in
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the custom Session class...I can't pull
> > >     the bean data
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> up
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> w/o
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> the
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exception occuring, it would seem.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So again, is there a way to turn logging
> > >     debugging
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> off so
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> the
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> test
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't happen at all...so I can quit
> > >     trying to find
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> work-arounds?
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even if my error supression did work,
> > >     it's not a very
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>> elegant
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> solution
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - it might be better if the serialization
> > >     wasn't
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> being
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> tested
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> at all.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks <
> > >     [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Excellent, I'll move forward then and
> > >     see how it
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> goes...thanks!
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Johan Compagner <
> > >     [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it just works is logical. It is
> > >     just a test we
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> try
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> to
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> serialize
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it so
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you get a warning if that is not
> > >     possible
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> because
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> of a
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> non
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serializeable object.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks <
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I've created a small test-app in
> > >     Netbeans
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> where
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> I'm
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> using a
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page and have overridden
> > >     ISessionFactory in the
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> app
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> class
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> to
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> create
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> session.  I have a page where I call
> > >     the stateful
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>> bean,
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> create
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> store it in session if it's
> > >     non-existent, and
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> supply a
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> link to
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> clear
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the bean from session.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When first calling the page - when the
> > >     stub is
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> first
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> stored in
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> session, the page fails.  If I
> > >     re-visit the page
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> the
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> values have
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually been stored...amazingly
> > >     enough...and the
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> page
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> does not
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> fail
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but displays the values in session.  I
> > >     can click
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> the
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> link,
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> clear
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it,
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and start the whole process over again
> > >     and it is
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> consistent.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So that begs the question - would I be
> > >     safe
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> supressing
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> the
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> exception
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the custom session class where I'm
> > >     storing the
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> bean
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> stub?
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Or, is
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it possible that I'm not getting the
> > >     correct
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> reference
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> to
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> the
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> bean
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> due
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the serialization failure?
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If someone wants a copy of my little
> > >     test app -
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> I'd be
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> happy to
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> send
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> along.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks <
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, this was the first app I've
> > >     ever built w/
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> EJB
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> technology
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *any* version...it's sort of a pilot
> > >     app for
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> future
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> in-house
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> efforts....so far it's worked out
> great.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, correct me if I'm wrong but it's my
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> understanding
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> that if
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I do
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> store the stub to the interface of
> > >     the stateful
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> bean
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> in
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> an
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> HTTP
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> session - I may lose the reference to
> > >     that bean
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> the
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> next
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> time
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> call
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I'm calling the stateful bean and
> > >     storing a
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>> reference
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> to
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it in
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http session so I can recall that
> > >     exact instance
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> back
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> from the
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> later.  This is how it was done in
> > >     the app that
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> is
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> currently
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in production on JBoss.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Matej Knopp <
> > >     [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, I don't really understand,
> > >     why is the
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> ejb
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> object
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serialized. Do you store your
> > >     service objects in
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> session?
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Matej
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well, the problem might be that it is
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> serialized by
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> wicket
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this is done because you have the
> > >     logger set to
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>> debug
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> to
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> help
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identify
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things you put into session that
> > >     might not be
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> serializable.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> container doesnt serialize the same
> > >     way so when
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> the
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> container
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its not a problem, but when wicket
> > >     does it it
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> is a
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> problem.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Igor
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/5/06, Vincent Jenks <
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know, I would believe that
> > >     if I
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> weren't
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> able
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> to
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> make
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stateful bean and use it exactly
> > >     how I did in
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>> Wicket,
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> outside
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I setup a test project and their
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>> stateful/stateless
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> beans
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flawlessly when tested against
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> JSP/Servlets....the
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> problem
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arises
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> w/
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket + SFSB on Glassfish.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/5/06, Igor Vaynberg <
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by:
> > >     java.io.NotSerializableExcepti
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on:
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >
> com.sun.ejb.containers.EJBLocalObjectInvocationHandlerDelegate
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (ObjectOutputStream.java:1075)
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looks like a bug in sun's impl of
> > >     ejbs?
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Igor
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/5/06, Vincent Jenks <
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm testing an app I just
> > >     finished and is
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>> currently
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> running
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JBoss
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  on Sun's Glassfish (SJAS 9.0) to
> > >     test
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>> compatibility
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> and
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> see
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's a
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> viable option going forward w/
> > >     our enterprise
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> efforts.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I seem to be having an issue w/
> > >     storing
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> objects
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> in
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> session.
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> runs fine until I utilize the
> > >     overridden
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> ISessionFactory
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> store
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> objects - then I start getting
> > >     exceptions
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> like
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>> this:
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >
> **********************************************************************
> > >
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >> StandardWrapperValve[ProductCatalogApp]:
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Servlet.service()
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for servlet
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ProductCatalogApp threw exception
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wicket.WicketRuntimeException :
> > >     Internal
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> error
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> cloning
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> object. Make
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure all dependent objects
> implement
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>> Serializable.
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Class:
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com.myapp.ui.admin.UserSession
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> wicket.protocol.http.HttpSessionStore.setAttribute
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ( HttpSessionStore.java :62)
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>> wicket.Session.setAttribute(Session.java :914)
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>> wicket.Session.update(Session.java:938)
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >> wicket.protocol.http.WebSession.update
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> (WebSession.java :116)
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
> wicket.RequestCycle.detach
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ( RequestCycle.java:818)
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
> wicket.RequestCycle.steps
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ( RequestCycle.java:1052)
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wicket.RequestCycle.request
> > >     (RequestCycle.java:453)
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet.doGet
> > >     > > > > >>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (WicketServlet.java:215)
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>
> javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :707)
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >     > > > > >>
> > >
> javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820)
> > >     > > > >
> ...
>
> [Message clipped]
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to