OK, that definitely helped...but.... Results : Tests run: 410, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [ERROR] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] There are test failures. [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Total time: 1 minute 22 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Mon Jul 10 13:48:34 MDT 2006 [INFO] Final Memory: 7M/35M [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 7/10/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > looks like their repo servers are overloaded -- too popular for their own > good > > try this: > > http://www.nabble.com/new-maven-repo-available-with-snapshots-tf1851211.html#a5054042 > > -Igor > > > > On 7/10/06, Vincent Jenks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No such luck - that didn't work any better. > > > > when doing 'mvn install' in the top-level WICKET_1_2 directory I get this > error: > > > > Downloading: > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-container- > > > default/1.0-alpha-8/plexus-container-default-1.0-alpha-8.pom > > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > [ERROR] BUILD ERROR > > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > [INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM). > > > > > > Project ID: org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-container-default > > > > Reason: Error getting POM for > 'org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-container-default' fro > > m the repository: Error transferring file > > > org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-container-default:pom:1.0-alpha-8 > > > > from the specified remote repositories: > > central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2), > > apache.snapshots > (http://svn.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository ), > > snapshots (http://snapshots.maven.codehaus.org/maven2) > > > > So, just for the sake of completeness I cd'd into the lower 'wicket' > > directory and ran 'mvn install' and got this: > > > > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > [ERROR] BUILD ERROR > > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > [INFO] Failed to resolve artifact. > > > > Error transferring file > > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:maven-plugin:2.2 > > > > from the specified remote repositories: > > central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2 ) > > > > > > Caused by I/O exception: Server returned HTTP response code: 503 for URL: > http:/ > > > /repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/2.2/maven > > -surefire-plugin-2.2.jar.sha1 > > > > Sounds like it might be better in concept than Ant but you run the > > risk of not being able to download dependencies - not sure I like the > > idea of relying on an internet connection for them. > > > > Anyhow...no closer than I was before. > > > > Any ideas? > > > > On 7/7/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > thats what i understood from martijn. the problem is that there is a > parent > > > pom file that all other projects inherit from, so that means that parent > pom > > > has to be installed in the maven repo in order for other projects to > find it > > > when you try to build > > > > > > so what i would do is > > > > > > > > > cd WICKET_1_2 > > > mvn install <<(possibly optional if you have the whole thing checked > out) > > > > > > cd wicket > > > mvn install > > > > > > and you should be good to go > > > > > > -Igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, V. Jenks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > So, if I check out all projects at > > > > > > > > https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket/tags/WICKET_1_2/ > > > > < > > > > https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket/tags/WICKET_1_2/wicket> > > > I > > > > should be able to build them w/ maven, as you described before? > > > > > > > > Igor Vaynberg wrote: > > > > > svn co > > > > > > > > > https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket/tags/WICKET_1_2/wicket > > > will > > > > > give you the 1.2 release > > > > > > > > > > maven doesnt work out of the box because of the new build thing > > > > > martijn is trying where you need to have a parent pom installed > first > > > > > so its a more tedious process unless you check out the entire folder > > > > > that contains all the projects. > > > > > > > > > > -Igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, *Vincent Jenks* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Ha! It ran w/o the exception! It would have been nice to get > > > around > > > > > the logging another way but I guess I'll take what I can get at > this > > > > > point. > > > > > > > > > > My last concern is - is 1.2.1.rc1 fit for production - because > this > > > > > site is *already* in production and I'm hesitant to throw a > > > relatively > > > > > unstable version of wicket into it. > > > > > > > > > > Could someone help me figure out how to build the 1.2 final > branch > > > > > w/o errors? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Vincent Jenks < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > OK, by dropping junit into the ant/lib dir from another > project > > > that > > > > > > happened to have junit in it, I was able to build it. Now > I'll > > > > > test > > > > > > w/ the logging commented out. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Vincent Jenks < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > > OK...I've never done anything manually w/ ant that needed > any > > > > > other > > > > > > > type of setup...so I'm sure I can't spend a lot of time on > > > > > that (today > > > > > > > at least). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What about maven? Why can't I build it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there another way for me to build it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Martijn Dashorst < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > Then you probably don't have done the steps to setup > ant... > > > ant > > > > > > > > requires you to install the junit jar into the ant/lib > > > > > folder iirc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's been a while since I've setup ant to work like > this... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, V. Jenks <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I did steps 1-5...it immediately fails because there is > no > > > > > build > > > > > > > > > file...so I went back up to the root where the build.xml > > > > > file was and > > > > > > > > > ran 'ant jar'...I eventually get this: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BUILD FAILED > > > > > > > > > /home/vjenks/Projects/java/wicket- > > > 1.2.1-rc1/build.xml:85: > > > > > Could not > > > > > > > > > create task or type of type: junit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ant could not find the task or a class this task relies > > > upon. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martijn Dashorst wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Instead of building from SVN, you might download the > > > > > distribution > > > > > > > > > > ( 1.2.1-rc1 is the newest), and use ant to build the > jar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the distribution contains all dependencies you need, > and > > > > > contains a > > > > > > > > > > build.xml for ant lovers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no need to learn yet another tool if you > don't > > > > > want to. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So the steps: > > > > > > > > > > 1. download wicket-1.2.1-rc1-bin.zip > > > > > > > > > > 2. unzip > > > > > > > > > > 3. cd into directory > > > > > > > > > > 4. do your changes in the src/java folder > > > > > > > > > > 5. start 'ant jar' > > > > > > > > > > 6. find the jar in the target directory (without > version > > > > > number unfortunately) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/7/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> the entire point of maven is that it downloads > > > > > dependencies for you and does > > > > > > > > > >> the rest of that crap so you dont have to :) > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> -Igor > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> I've heard of it but am not familiar...I'll look > into > > > it. > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> I was going to make a lib project in eclipse or > > > > > netbeans and build it > > > > > > > > > >>> that way but realized there's probably a pile of > > > > > dependencies I don't > > > > > > > > > >>> have...won't that be an issue even w/ maven? > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> All the lib folders only contain clover.... > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> On 7/6/06, Igor Vaynberg < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> naaah use maven2 > > > > > > > > > >>>> make the change in the src folder > > > > > > > > > >>>> type "mvn package" and you will have a .jar ready > in > > > > > the target dir > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> -Igor > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> OK, checked it out and I made my change....but > bare > > > > > w/ me...I'm almost > > > > > > > > > >>>>> completely unfamiliar w/ Ant and I figured that'd > be > > > > > the easiest way > > > > > > > > > >>>>> to build it? > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> So, how do I build this sucker? > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>> On 7/6/06, Igor Vaynberg < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> well, if it comes down to it just check out > wicket, > > > > > remove that > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> portion > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> of > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> code, and deploy it that way > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> -Igor > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks < > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> At 8:30 this morning...it's now 2:30pm here and > I > > > > > was the *last* > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> person to post to this forum at all...which is > > > > > weird...it's > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> normally > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> pretty busy. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=16673&tstart=0 > > > > > > > > > <http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=16673&tstart=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> This is the first time I haven't gotten an > answer > > > > > to my problem on > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> same day...they're *almost* as good as you guys! > :) > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Eelco Hillenius < > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Did you try asking around on the glassfish > list/ > > > > > IRC channel (if > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> they > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> have one)? > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Eelco > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks < > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> I have no idea...but I'm lost at this point. > I > > > > > have both > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> commons-logging and log4j in the glassfish/lib > > > > > folder because > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> it > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> is a > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> requirement for using Hibernate as the > > > > > persistence engine. I > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> put > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> the > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> log4j.properties in there w/ the suggested > > > > > entries and > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> restarted...the > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> error is the same - didn't work. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> I tried deploying log4j in my war's /lib > folder > > > > > and packaging > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> log4j.properties in there...made no > > > > > difference...I can't get > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> exception message to change. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> ugh.... :( > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Matej Knopp < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Wicket uses commons-logging. I wonder whether > > > > > glassfish > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> doesn't > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> have > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> it's own weird logger factory, just like > jetty > > > > > does. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> -Matej > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Eelco Hillenius wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> In fact log4j.logger.wicket=INFO should be > > > enough. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Eelco > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks > > > > > < [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> log4j.debug=false > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> log4j.rootLogger=INFO > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> log4j.logger.org=INFO > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> log4j.logger.com=INFO > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> log4j.logger.net=INFO > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> log4j.logger.nl=INFO > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> log4j.logger.wicket=INFO > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > log4j.logger.wicket.protocol.http.HttpSessionStore=INFO > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > log4j.logger.org.apache.catalina.cluster=INFO > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > log4j.logger.wicket.version=INFO > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > log4j.logger.wicket.RequestCycle=INFO > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > logger.wicket.protocol.http=INFO > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > log4j.appender.Stdout=org.apache.log4j.ConsoleAppender > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > log4j.appender.Stdout.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > log4j.appender.Stdout.layout.conversionPattern=%-5p > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> - > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> %- 26.26c{1} - %m\n > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Igor Vaynberg < > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> paste your complete log4j.properties file > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -Igor > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks < > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's where I put it - nothing changed > so > > > > > you're > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> obviously > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> right...it > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't make a difference anyways. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmm...this is bad...this puts me in a > rough > > > > > spot as I > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> have > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> no > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> idea how > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use a "spring like proxy" and am not > at > > > > > all familiar > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> w/ > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spring....and in effect I'd have no idea > > > > > how to do this > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> in > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> Wicket or > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what it would involve. It's obviously > > > > > going to involve > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> me > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> reworking a > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bunch of my existing code just to move to > > > > > another > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> container...which > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> shouldn't have been the case. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Igor Vaynberg < > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are doing it fine, you just have to > find > > > a > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> location > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> for > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> log4j.properties > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where glassfish will pick it up. usually > > > > > it is in > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> war/web-inf/classes > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Igor > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks < > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For whatever reason, I'm unable to > > > > > supress this > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> exception > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> in > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> the > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> storefront application (where I really > need > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> it.) I've > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> tried > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> wrapping > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a try/catch around the assignment and > > > > > retrieval of > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> SFSB > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> stub in > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the custom Session class...I can't pull > > > > > the bean data > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> up > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> w/o > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> the > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exception occuring, it would seem. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So again, is there a way to turn > logging > > > > > debugging > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> off so > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> the > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> test > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't happen at all...so I can quit > > > > > trying to find > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> work-arounds? > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even if my error supression did work, > > > > > it's not a very > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> elegant > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> solution > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - it might be better if the > serialization > > > > > wasn't > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> being > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> tested > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> at all. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks < > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Excellent, I'll move forward then and > > > > > see how it > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> goes...thanks! > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Johan Compagner < > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it just works is logical. It is > > > > > just a test we > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> try > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> to > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> serialize > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it so > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that you get a warning if that is not > > > > > possible > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> because > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> of a > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> non > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serializeable object. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks < > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, I've created a small test-app in > > > > > Netbeans > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> where > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> I'm > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> using a > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page and have overridden > > > > > ISessionFactory in the > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> app > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> class > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> to > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> create > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> session. I have a page where I call > > > > > the stateful > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> bean, > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> create > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> store it in session if it's > > > > > non-existent, and > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> supply a > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> link to > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> clear > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the bean from session. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When first calling the page - when > the > > > > > stub is > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> first > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> stored in > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> session, the page fails. If I > > > > > re-visit the page > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> values have > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually been stored...amazingly > > > > > enough...and the > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> page > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> does not > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> fail > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but displays the values in session. > I > > > > > can click > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> link, > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> clear > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it, > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and start the whole process over > again > > > > > and it is > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> consistent. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So that begs the question - would I > be > > > > > safe > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> supressing > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> the > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> exception > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the custom session class where > I'm > > > > > storing the > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> bean > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> stub? > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Or, is > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it possible that I'm not getting the > > > > > correct > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> reference > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> to > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> the > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> bean > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> due > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the serialization failure? > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If someone wants a copy of my little > > > > > test app - > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> I'd be > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> happy to > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> send > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> along. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks < > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, this was the first app I've > > > > > ever built w/ > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> EJB > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> technology > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *any* version...it's sort of a > pilot > > > > > app for > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> future > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> in-house > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> efforts....so far it's worked out > > > great. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, correct me if I'm wrong but > it's my > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> understanding > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> that if > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I do > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> store the stub to the interface of > > > > > the stateful > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> bean > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> in > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> an > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> HTTP > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> session - I may lose the reference > to > > > > > that bean > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> next > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> time > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> call > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I'm calling the stateful bean > and > > > > > storing a > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> reference > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> to > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it in > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http session so I can recall that > > > > > exact instance > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> back > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> from the > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> later. This is how it was done in > > > > > the app that > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> is > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> currently > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in production on JBoss. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/06, Matej Knopp < > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, I don't really understand, > > > > > why is the > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> ejb > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> object > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> serialized. Do you store your > > > > > service objects in > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> session? > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Matej > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor Vaynberg wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well, the problem might be that > it is > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> serialized by > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> wicket > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this is done because you have the > > > > > logger set to > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> debug > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> to > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> help > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identify > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things you put into session that > > > > > might not be > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> serializable. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> container doesnt serialize the > same > > > > > way so when > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> container > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its not a problem, but when > wicket > > > > > does it it > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> is a > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> problem. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Igor > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/5/06, Vincent Jenks < > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know, I would believe > that > > > > > if I > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> weren't > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>> able > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> to > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> make > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stateful bean and use it exactly > > > > > how I did in > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Wicket, > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> outside > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I setup a test project and their > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> stateful/stateless > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> beans > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flawlessly when tested against > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> JSP/Servlets....the > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> problem > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arises > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> w/ > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket + SFSB on Glassfish. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/5/06, Igor Vaynberg < > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: > > > > > java.io.NotSerializableExcepti > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on: > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > com.sun.ejb.containers.EJBLocalObjectInvocationHandlerDelegate > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0 > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (ObjectOutputStream.java:1075) > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looks like a bug in sun's impl > of > > > > > ejbs? > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Igor > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/5/06, Vincent Jenks < > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm testing an app I just > > > > > finished and is > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> currently > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> running > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JBoss > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on Sun's Glassfish (SJAS 9.0) > to > > > > > test > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> compatibility > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> and > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> see > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's a > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> viable option going forward w/ > > > > > our enterprise > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> efforts. > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I seem to be having an issue w/ > > > > > storing > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > ... > > [Message clipped] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > > > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
