Hi, Erik,

> If this gets accepted, may I humbly suggest to replace
>   value != null && !"".equals(value)
> with
>   value != null && value.length() != 0
> The latter performs considerably faster (though it is of course still a
> micro optimization).

You're right... already updated! Thanks.

Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
Wicket-user mailing list

Reply via email to