Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
> On 2/14/07, ChuckDeal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Wicket 1.3 (revision 507527)
>
> We're at 507700 now. Could you please update and see how that works?
> Wicket defaults on normal serialization again and has improved
> diagnostics for serialization problems.
>
If I make it to work tomorrow, it'll be the first thing I do!
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
> If you want to help us make custom serialization good though, your
> help would be much appreciated. Test that by setting:
>
> Objects.setObjectStreamFactory(new WicketObjectStreamFactory());
>
As long as it doesn't impact development too much, I'll give it a shot. At
least I know how to switch between the serialization methods now. So, if I
do run into a problem, I should be able to switch back to try and get by it.
What kinds of things do you want to know about and how should I tell you?
Just post the problem as I did here or is there a specific thread you want
it posted to?
Chuck
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/custom-serialization-problem-tf3229766.html#a8974259
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
