Hi,

The 3 key arguments against wicket were:
-It will be easier to hire someone with Struts knowledge on top of the fact that we have some in-house knowledge with it. -Struts is the de-facto standard with a lot of community/vendor/documentation support -Struts seems heavy on the java-code required for things that are pretty simple with struts

I agree that it was not a pure technology issue in the end and that the comparison was not purely on technical capabilities. The ability to build clean self-contained components as wicket allows was not at all appreciated. They did not see the potential for us to build our own custom components on top. Oddly enough that was seen as an "improper separation of concern" because then java is used for presentation aspects like layout. Frankly I think this is an idea that has been manufactured by other frameworks to sell their scattered technology/markup/syntax framework approaches.

I have dabbled with other frameworks and thought that for default behavior it would be nice not to have a line of code per label in a table. There was a comment that there is different handling in a DataView. But is that true? I have used them and I had to add new Label(...) in the populateItem() method.

anyways... what can you do... I still think wicket is a pretty dam good framework.

thanks,
florian



Peter Thomas wrote:

    > I am sad to announce that my company did not choose to use
    wicket after
    > comparison with struts 2. :-(
    >
    > One criticism that came out as we were looking at Wicket code
    was that
    > there seems to be a need to write a lot of Java code in a
    ListView for
    > such things as displaying a table. Although I did not see this
    issue as
    > out-weighing all the benefits, many of my colleagues did.


All I'll say is that I'm personally sure this is not about technology - this has to be politics, and these colleagues must have already learnt Struts2 and want to protect their investment or have the misconception that Struts2 == Struts1. Or maybe they were swayed by some presentation that used job search statistics to compare web ui frameworks...

Sometimes it is a waste of time to try and convince people. Been there done that. Just move on.

Regards,

Peter.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to