> no, it isnt called in wrap. but the reason he wants this is to access the > model, so i would imagine a call to getmodel() from within the listener isnt > far behind.
True, but this is not directly related to whether wrap can be called there or not. > the only reason i agreed to allow to set the id is that getid() is the only > way to get to it, it is a simple field and getid() is final - so all paths > to that are final as well. Yes, that was my reasoning when I implemented it like that. But wrap didn't exist yet so I obviously didn't have an opinion about that. Anyway, roll back? Eelco ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
