i say rollback. i dont want to have a can of worms opened this late in the
game. lets wait for his usecase, it might even be doable without this thing.
-igor
On 6/18/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> no, it isnt called in wrap. but the reason he wants this is to access
the
> model, so i would imagine a call to getmodel() from within the listener
isnt
> far behind.
True, but this is not directly related to whether wrap can be called
there or not.
> the only reason i agreed to allow to set the id is that getid() is the
only
> way to get to it, it is a simple field and getid() is final - so all
paths
> to that are final as well.
Yes, that was my reasoning when I implemented it like that. But wrap
didn't exist yet so I obviously didn't have an opinion about that.
Anyway, roll back?
Eelco
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
